| Name | UP Wapsipinicon River Bridge Chicago & North Western Railway Bridge #73 |
| Built By | Chicago & North Western Railway |
| Currently Owned By | Union Pacific Railroad |
| Superstructure Contractor | American Bridge Company of New York |
| Substructure Contractor | Unknown |
| Length | 314 Feet Total, 157 Foot Spans |
| Width | 2 Tracks |
| Height Above Ground | 10 Feet (Estimated) |
| Superstructure Design | Quadrangular Lattice Through Truss |
| Substructure Design | Concrete |
| Date Built | 1912 |
| Traffic Count | 50 Trains/Day (Estimated) |
| Current Status | In Use |
| Chicago & North Western Railway Bridge Number | 73 |
| Union Pacific Railroad Bridge Number | 33.31 |
| Significance | Moderate Significance |
| Documentation Date | 8/9/2013; 12/16/2017 |
In 1856, the Chicago, Iowa & Nebraska Rail Road (CI&N) began construction on a new mainline across Iowa, connecting an existing Galena & Chicago Union Railroad (G&CU) line at Fulton, Illinois to the Missouri River. To establish construction, a temporary ferry was installed across the Mississippi River at Clinton in 1856. In 1857, the first 44 miles were completed to Wheatland, Iowa. The following year, 20 miles were completed to Lisbon, Iowa; and in 1859, an addition 17 miles were completed to Cedar Rapids, Iowa. In 1861, the Cedar Rapids & Missouri River Railroad (CR&MR) constructed an additional 41 miles to Chelsea, Iowa; followed by 29 miles to Marshalltown, Iowa in 1862. After pausing in 1863, an additional 29 miles were completed to Nevada, Iowa in 1864, followed by 23 additional miles to Boone, Iowa in 1865. In 1864, both the CI&N and CR&MR were leased by the Chicago & North Western Railway (C&NW). In 1867, the line continued west from Boone, reaching the Missouri River at Council Bluffs, Iowa in 1867.
During the second half of the 19th Century, the C&NW had constructed and acquired a large amount of trackage throughout the Midwest. This line formed a principal mainline for the C&NW, connecting western railroads at Omaha to the railroad hub of Chicago. In 1884, the C&IN and CM&MR were formally acquired by the C&NW. In 1887, the Linn County Railway (LC) constructed a 6-mile cutoff, bypassing Cedar Rapids to the south between Otis, Iowa and Beverly, Iowa. At the end of the year, the LC was formally acquired by the C&NW. During the late 19th Century, several other improvements were made to this line. Between 1890 and 1891, a second track was constructed between Clinton and Lowden, Iowa; and between Libson and the Cedar River bridge. Between 1893 and 1894, a second track was constructed between Lowden and Lisbon. A second track was added to the original mainline through Cedar Rapids in 1898, and between 1898 and 1899, a second track was constructed between the Cedar River bridge and the west side of Marshalltown. In 1901, a second track was completed between Marshalltown and Boone, and new facilities were constructed at Boone. Throughout the 20th Century, the Cedar River bridge remained a gauntlet structure, severely hindering efficient operations.
By the 20th Century, the C&NW was operating an extensive railroad network, which radiated north and west from Chicago. This line served as the backbone of the C&NW, connecting transcontinental freight and passengers at Omaha to Chicago. Known as the Overland Route, this line became one of the most significant railroad routes in the United States. This route saw continuous upgrades during the 20th Century, including significant bridge, rail, tie and signal upgrades. In 1995, the C&NW was purchased by Union Pacific Railroad (UP). In 2002, UP constructed a second track at the Cedar River bridge, eliminating a single track bottleneck in the network. Today, this line remains vital to UP and is still well maintained. The Clinton to Boone segment is known as the Clinton Subdivision, and remains a heavily used double track mainline.
Located east of Wheatland, this quadrangular lattice through truss bridge carries a former Chicago & North Western Railway mainline over the Wapsipinicon River. The first bridge at this location was likely a wooden through truss bridge, constructed when the line was first built. It is believed that this bridge was likely replaced by an iron through truss bridge of an unknown design in the 1870s. In 1888, the bridge was reconstructed with a pair of single track 157-foot quadrangular lattice through truss spans, set onto stone substructures. These spans were fabricated by the Lassig Bridge & Iron Works, and featured a flat decorative portal bracing, typical of spans from the mid to late 1880s. In 1891, the bridge was widened for a second track by extending the stone substructures and adding two similar single track spans. These spans were also fabricated by the Lassig Bridge & Iron Works, and featured a standard Lassig-style pedimented portal bracing. As trains became heavier in the early 20th Century, it was decided to upgrade this bridge. In late 1911, crews began working to reconstruct the substructures with concrete. By early 1912, new steel truss spans were installed, and the old bridge was dismantled. It is believed that the four single track spans from the previous bridge were reused at other locations on the C&NW system, although it is not clear where. Currently, the bridge consists of a pair of double track 157-foot quadrangular lattice through truss spans, set onto concrete substructures.
The truss spans use a standard design for double track lattice spans from this era, with heavy members, a standard floor and M-frame portal bracing. The top chord and endposts both consist of built-up beams, composed of two heavy U-shaped channels connected by V-lacing on the interior and a solid plate on the exterior. The bottom chord uses a similar design, with V-lacing and short plates on both sides. The vertical members and outer two compression members consist of solid beams. The remaining compression members consist of two different styles of V-laced beams. All of the tension members consist of L-shaped bars. The floor system uses two plate girder stringers per track, and plate girder floorbeams at the panel points. The lower lateral bracing is composed of L-shaped bars. Typical of spans from this era, the portal bracing uses an M-frame design, composed exclusively of V-laced beams. Both the sway bracing and upper lateral bracing consist of V-laced beams of a similar design. The abutments use a standard rectangular design, with short sloped wing walls. The center pier has been heavily modified with sheet piling and concrete encasement. American Bridge Company fabricated the superstructure, and it is unclear if the substructure was constructed by railroad company forces or by an unknown contractor.
This type of truss design is relatively uncommon throughout the United States. However, a few railroads preferred the design, such as the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway (Rock Island), the Chicago & North Western Railway (C&NW) and the Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway (Omaha Road). Spans constructed in the late 1870s and early 1880s for the C&NW featured an arched and pedimented lattice portal bracing, light sway bracing and laced members. The second generation was nearly exclusively constructed by Lassig Bridge & Iron Works between 1884 and 1900, and featured heavier members and a pedimented portal bracing. While the design fell out of favor for the Rock Island and Omaha Road around the turn of the 20th Century, the design remained popular with the C&NW into the 1920s. 19th Century versions of this design were primarily constructed out of iron, while 20th Century versions of this design used much heavier members and were constructed of steel. The C&NW preferred this design, as it was both strong and demonstrated great resilience in case of a derailment. A handful of spans using this design were constructed along this route, primarily to cross large rivers. Since the initial construction, the bridge has seen a handful of few alterations. The center pier was rebuilt with sheet piling and concrete encasement in approximately 1970. In addition, certain rivets throughout the truss were replaced by high strength bolts in the early 21st Century. Today, the bridge remains in regular and heavy use as part of a Union Pacific Railroad mainline. Overall, the bridge appears to be in fair to good condition, with no significant deterioration noted. The author has ranked this bridge as being moderately significant, due to the truss design.
Citations
| Build date and builder (superstructure) | Chicago & North Western Railway Valuation Notes at the Chicago & North Western Historical Society Archives |
| Railroad History Citation | ICC Valuation Information, Compiled by Richard S. Steele |