Manitowoc Railroad Crossing (East)


Click the photo to view the full-size version

1/25
Date Taken:
Author:
Caption:

Name Manitowoc Railroad Crossing (East)
Chicago & North Western Railway Bridge #2121 1/2
Built By Wisconsin Central Railway
Chicago & North Western Railway
Currently Owned By Canadian National Railway
Superstructure Contractor Wisconsin Bridge & Iron Company of North Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Substructure Contractor Butler-Ryan Company of St. Paul, Minnesota
Design Engineer Robert B. Tweedy
Length 132 Feet Total
Width 1 Track
Height Above Ground 25 Feet (Estimated)
Superstructure Design Quadrangular Lattice Through Truss
Substructure Design Stone Masonry
Date Built 1896
Traffic Count 0 Trains/Day (Bridge is Abandoned)
Current Status Abandoned
Chicago & North Western Railway Bridge Number 2121 1/2 (Old 321/2121-A)
Canadian National Railway Bridge Number 2121 1/2
Significance Regional Significance
Documentation Date 8/5/2016

In 1872, the Milwaukee, Manitowoc and Green Bay Railroad (MM&GB) constructed 49 miles of new railroad, extending from Lake Shore Junction on the north side of Milwaukee, Wisconsin to Sheboygan, Wisconsin.  The MM&GB changed its name to the Milwaukee, Lake Shore and Western Railroad (MLS&W) after completion of the line.  The following year, the MLS&W resumed construction, completing an additional 32 miles to Two Rivers, Wisconsin, via Manitowoc, Wisconsin.  The MLS&W was reorganized as the Milwaukee, Lake Shore and Western Railway (MLS&W) in 1885, which again was reorganized with the same name in 1883.  The MLS&W had constructed a handful of lines in northeast Wisconsin during the late 19th Century, primarily to connect Lake Michigan and Lake Superior.  This line initially provided the MLS&W with a connection to the Chicago & North Western Railway (C&NW) at Milwaukee, which allowed the MLS&W to access Chicago. Due to the success of the MLS&W, the railroad was purchased by the Chicago & North Western Railway in 1893.  The C&NW had acquired and constructed a vast network of railroad lines throughout the Midwest during the late 19th Century, and the MLS&W system provided more opportunities for expansion.  

During the early 20th Century, the C&NW sought to improve operations by constructing new lines and improving existing lines.  The C&NW had become one of the premiere Midwest railroads, and sought to stay profitable and competitive.  The Manitowoc, Green Bay and North Western Railway (MGB&NW) was incorporated as a subsidiary of the C&NW in 1904 to construct a new connection between Manitowoc and Green Bay.  A 36 mile line was completed between the two cities in 1906, and the MGB&NW was sold to the C&NW in 1909.  Also in 1906, a bypass around the west side of Sheboygan was constructed to avoid the congested lakefront line.  These new lines provided the C&NW with a faster route between Chicago and Green Bay, serving Milwaukee and bypassing the industrial areas along Lake Winnebago.  As traffic on the route grew in the 20th Century, the Village of Whitefish Bay became concerned with the growing amount of trains through the Village.  In response, the C&NW constructed a short 4 mile cutoff between the north side of Whitefish Bay and Wiscona, a railroad junction on the north side of Milwaukee in 1929.  The portion of the line between Lake Shore Junction and Whitefish Bay would be removed immediately after completion of the cutoff.  Throughout the 20th Century, this line remained a core mainline for the C&NW, and was known as the Shoreline Subdivision.

By the late 20th Century, the C&NW sought to consolidate operations and abandon or sell unprofitable lines.  In 1988, the C&NW sold the Cleveland, Wisconsin to Green Bay segment and the Two Rivers Branch to the Fox River Valley Railroad, which became the Fox Valley and Western Ltd. (FV&W) in 1993.  The FV&W was a subsidiary of the successful Wisconsin Central Ltd. (WC), which had acquired a large amount of former Milwaukee Road and Soo Line trackage in Wisconsin.  The C&NW was purchased by Union Pacific Railroad (UP) in 1995. In 1996, the segment between Denmark, Wisconsin and Rockwood, Wisconsin was abandoned and acquired for future trail use.  In 2001, WC was purchased by Canadian National Railway (CN), and became the American subsidiary of the railroad. The Two Rivers Branch was abandoned in the 1990s or early 2000s.  Much of the original line through Sheboygan was abandoned in approximately 2005, and CN abandoned the line between Manitowoc and Cleveland in 2013.  In 2021, the Green Bay to Denmark segment was sold to the Fox Valley & Lake Superior Rail System (FOXY).  Today, UP operates the Shoreline Subdivision between Wiscona and Cleveland; and CN operates the Shoreline Subdivision between Manitowoc and Rockwood.  FOXY continues to operate the Denmark Branch between Green Bay and Denmark.  The Rockwood to Denmark segment is known as the Devils River State Trail, and much of the original line through Sheboygan has been reused as a trail.  Much of the UP segment between Sheboygan and Cleveland is out of service, and its future uncertain.


Located on the north side of Manitowoc, this through truss bridge carries the former Chicago & North Western Railway (C&NW) line from Manitowoc to Appleton and Two Rivers over the former Soo Line Manitowoc Branch. When the Wisconsin Central Railway extended from Hilbert Junction to Manitowoc, a crossing of the existing C&NW line was needed . Due to the grade differences, it was decided to construct a grade separated crossing. Since the WC was the later railroad built, the WC was required to pay for the construction of the underpass. It is likely that the C&NW required that the bridge carrying their tracks to be designed per their specifications, and railroad records indicate that the WC and later Soo Line were required to maintain the structure. Work on the bridge began in late 1895, and the bridge was completed in 1896. Due to the acute angle that the railroads crossed, a longer through truss span was required instead of a plate girder bridge. While the truss span uses a lattice design which was standard for the C&NW, the span has a number of unique differences from lattice spans constructed by the C&NW. Currently, the bridge consists of a 132-foot, riveted quadrangular lattice through truss span, set onto stone abutments. The truss span is constructed of a number of a combination of built-up beams and solid bars, uses an unusual floor system and contains portal bracings which are different from other C&NW-designed lattice truss spans.

The top chord of the truss span is composed of a built-up beam, with X-lacing on the bottom and a solid plate on the top. The endposts also use a similar design, with X-lacing on the bottom and a solid plate on the outside. Similar to other lattice truss bridges from this era, the bottom chord is composed of two parallel channels, although they are not connected by any lacing or plates. The diagonal members of the bridge follow two different designs, with the tension members comprised of L-shaped steel bars and the compression members constructed of tightly V-laced built-up beams. The floor system of the bridge is unusual, with the bottom chord sitting above the floorbeams. In addition, the truss lines are set further apart than similar aged lattice truss spans. The stringers are composed of two steel stringers, with each stringer placed outside of the rails. The floorbeams are composed of shallow plate girders, which are connected to the bottom chord by a trapezoidal shaped gusset plate. From the mid-1880s to the turn of the 20th Century, lattice trusses constructed for the C&NW exclusively used a "Lassig-style" portal bracing, with a pedimented lattice bar, a solid center plate and heel bracing with decorative flower-shaped cutouts. The portal bracing of this bridge follows a similar design, which appears to have been modified to prevent a potential patent infringement of the Lassig style portal. Instead of using thin bars for the pedimented lattice bar, this bridge uses L-shaped bars. In addition, the top of the portal is more rounded, and the solid center plate contains a cutout and three sets of five decorative holes on the top and the bottom. Unlike the Lassig style heel bracing, the heel bracing on this bridge uses a triangular plate, with a decorative cutout consisting of a circle surrounded by three different sized triangles. Both the upper lateral bracing and the lower lateral bracing consist of square steel bars, typical for trusses using this design. The abutments use an unusual design due to the geometry, consisting of a lengthy stepped wing wall on the northwest and southeast corners, and no wing wall on the remaining corners. These wing walls extend parallel to the railroad underneath, and stone for the abutments appears to be constructed of a white limestone quarried at Duck Creek, Wisconsin.

Because the WC awarded the contract for bridge work on this line to the Wisconsin Bridge & Iron Company, it is believed that this company fabricated the truss span. In addition, the abutments were constructed by the Butler-Ryan Company, a firm which did significant work for the WC. It is believed that the truss span was designed by Robert B. Tweedy, Chief Engineer of the Wisconsin Central Railway and was based on the standard C&NW lattice truss design. This type of truss design is relatively uncommon throughout the United States. However, a few railroads preferred the design, such as the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway (Rock Island), the Chicago & North Western Railway (C&NW) and the Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway (Omaha Road). Spans constructed in the early 1880s for the C&NW featured an arched and pedimented lattice portal bracing, light sway bracing and laced members. The second generation was nearly exclusively constructed by Lassig Bridge & Iron Works between 1884 and 1900, and featured heavier members and a pedimented portal bracing. Between the mid-1870s and late 1920s, the C&NW used this design nearly exclusively, due to its strength and resilience if damaged. It is believed that this span is among the only lattice trusses ever constructed by the Wisconsin Bridge & Iron Company, and is likely the product of a unique agreement between the C&NW and WC. The similarities and differences between this span and a standard Lassig-designed C&NW span are likely the result of Robert B. Tweedy slightly redesigning the standard C&NW design, possibly to avoid infringing on an existing patent. Since the initial construction, the bridge has seen no significant alterations. Today, both the railroad above and railroad below are abandoned with the tracks removed. It is unknown what the future holds for this unique bridge, although the author hopes that it can be preserved or possibly be reused as part of a pedestrian trail. Overall, the bridge appears to be in fair to good condition, with no significant deterioration noted. The author has ranked this bridge as being regionally significant, due to the unique variation of a standard truss design.


Citations

Build date Portal cutout
Builder (superstructure) The Railway Review; January 25, 1896
Builder (substructure) The Manitowoc Pilot; November 7, 1895
Railroad History Citation ICC Valuation Information, Compiled by Richard S. Steele

Loading...